[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":102},["ShallowReactive",2],{"letter-meta-da-si-ma-jian-yi-shu":3,"letter-text-da-si-ma-jian-yi-shu-zh":25,"letter-bg-da-si-ma-jian-yi-shu-zh":57,"letter-original-da-si-ma-jian-yi-shu":75},{"id":4,"title":5,"author":9,"date":12,"extension":13,"featured":14,"meta":15,"originalLanguage":16,"recipient":17,"reviewStatus":21,"source":22,"stem":23,"__hash__":24},"letterMetas\u002Fletters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Fmeta.json",{"zh":6,"en":7,"ja":8},"答司马谏议书","Reply to the remonstrance of Sima Guang","司馬諫議に答ふる書",{"zh":10,"en":11,"ja":10},"王安石","Wang Anshi","1070-02-27","json",false,{},"lzh",{"zh":18,"en":19,"ja":20},"司马光（司马君实）","Sima Guang (Sima Junshi)","司馬光（司馬諫議）","reviewed","- 底本：《临川先生文集》卷七十三（上海古籍出版社版）\n- 参校本：《古文观止》卷十二、维基文库校对本（https:\u002F\u002Fzh.wikisource.org\u002Fwiki\u002F答司馬諫議書）","letters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Fmeta","5N-4bBNeKW6_i-ZdOu6miz25qfK5p7oUgcOdRhSbpVQ",{"id":26,"title":6,"body":27,"description":36,"extension":50,"meta":51,"navigation":52,"path":53,"seo":54,"stem":55,"__hash__":56},"letterDocs\u002Fletters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Fzh\u002Ftext.md",{"type":28,"value":29,"toc":46},"minimark",[30,33,37,40,43],[31,32,6],"h1",{"id":6},[34,35,36],"p",{},"王安石禀启：昨日承蒙赐教，我私下认为与君实（司马光）交游相好日久，但在议论国事时常常意见不合，是因为我们所奉行的政治主张与方法大不相同的缘故。虽然想要硬跟您强作解释，但终究一定不能得到您的谅解，所以先前只是简略复信，没有再一一为自己辩解。但又考虑到承蒙君实看重与厚待，在书信往来中不应当草率敷衍，所以今天详细说明原因，希望君实或许能谅解我。",[34,38,39],{},"大凡学者所争论的，关键在于名义与实质是否相符。名实理清了，天下大道理就得出了。如今君实用来指教我的，是认为我“侵官、生事、征利、拒谏”，以至于招致天下人的怨恨与诽谤。我则认为：接受君主命令，在朝廷上讨论并修订法度，再交给主管部门去执行，这不叫侵官；施行先王的善政，来兴利除弊，这不叫生事；为国家理顺财政，这不叫征利；驳斥邪说，诘难奸佞小人，这不叫拒谏。至于怨恨与诽谤之多，那本是我事先就知道必然会这样的。",[34,41,42],{},"人们习惯于苟且偷安非一日了，士大夫大多把不忧虑国事、随俗讨好大众视为善举。皇上想要改变这种风气，而我不去衡量反对力量的多少，想要出力协助皇上来抵制这股风气，那么大众怎么会不喧闹嘈杂呢？当年商王盘庚迁都，连百姓都互相抱怨，不单是朝廷士大夫而已。盘庚并不因为有人怨恨就改变原定的计划，而是考量是否符合正义而后行动，认为正确且看不出有可后悔的地方的缘故。倘若君实因我任职已久，未能协助皇上大有作为、以恩泽施于百姓而责备我，那我甘愿服罪；如果说是要我今天一切都不干，只死守以前的做法罢了，那就绝不是我所敢领教和赞同的了。",[34,44,45],{},"没有机会面谈，禁不住心中拳拳向往之至。",{"title":47,"searchDepth":48,"depth":48,"links":49},"",2,[],"md",{},true,"\u002Fletters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Fzh\u002Ftext",{"title":6,"description":36},"letters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Fzh\u002Ftext","j3UarfSWnCqAHBBRK2F8d2MOxj6Xmy53dhq6CNByL9w",{"id":58,"title":59,"body":60,"description":67,"extension":50,"meta":70,"navigation":52,"path":71,"seo":72,"stem":73,"__hash__":74},"letterDocs\u002Fletters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Fzh\u002Fbackground.md","答司马谏议书 - 历史背景",{"type":28,"value":61,"toc":68},[62,65],[31,63,59],{"id":64},"答司马谏议书-历史背景",[34,66,67],{},"北宋神宗熙宁三年（公元1070年），司马光写信给主持新政变法的王安石，批评新法“侵官、生事、征利、拒谏”。王安石写下此封复信，逐条驳斥司马光的指责，表明自己坚持变革新政、绝不退缩的坚定政治立场。",{"title":47,"searchDepth":48,"depth":48,"links":69},[],{},"\u002Fletters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Fzh\u002Fbackground",{"title":59,"description":67},"letters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Fzh\u002Fbackground","R7X49-A7Lf8qZIPmjiKl2gmodLHUsiMgJCyhD6nBXJE",{"id":76,"title":77,"body":78,"description":85,"extension":50,"meta":97,"navigation":52,"path":98,"seo":99,"stem":100,"__hash__":101},"letterDocs\u002Fletters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Foriginal.md","答司马谏议书 (原文)",{"type":28,"value":79,"toc":95},[80,83,86,89,92],[31,81,77],{"id":82},"答司马谏议书-原文",[34,84,85],{},"某启：昨日蒙教，窃以为与君实游处相好之日久，而议事每不合，所操之术多异故也。虽欲强聒，终必不蒙见察，故略上报，不复一一自辨。重念蒙君实视遇厚，于反覆不宜卤莽，故今具道所以，冀君实或见恕也。",[34,87,88],{},"盖儒者所争，尤在于名实。名实已明，而天下之理得矣。今君实所以见教者，以为侵官、生事、征利、拒谏，以致天下怨谤也。某则以谓：受命于人主，议法度而修之于朝廷，以授之于有司，不为侵官；举先王之政，以兴利除弊，不为生事；为天下理财，不为征利；辟邪说，难壬人，不为拒谏。至于怨谤之多，则固前知其如此也。",[34,90,91],{},"人习于苟且非一日，士大夫多以不恤国事、同俗自媚于众为善，上乃欲变此，而某不量敌之众寡，欲出力助上以抗之，则众何为而不汹汹然？盘庚之迁，胥怨者民也，非特朝廷士大夫而已。盘庚不为怨者故改其度，度义而后动，是而不见可悔故也。如君实责我以在位久，未能助上大有为，以膏泽斯民，则某知罪矣；如曰今日当一切不事事，守前所为而已，则非某之所敢知。",[34,93,94],{},"无由会晤，不任区区向往之至。",{"title":47,"searchDepth":48,"depth":48,"links":96},[],{},"\u002Fletters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Foriginal",{"title":77,"description":85},"letters\u002Fda-si-ma-jian-yi-shu\u002Foriginal","KhwpyH9NVuxjfyB_OfWDIGZEprm5lwr4ATSjsCvIR6Y",1787022360587]